Appeal dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the appellant's counsel; no substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRA-AS-138-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision:-11.11.2024
Ankush Goyal … Appellant
Versus
Satnam Singh
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Aman Mittal, Advocate for the respondent.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
Today, at the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant
submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present appeal.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the present appeal is
dismissed as withdrawn.
11.11.2024 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) Pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
Pankaj Kakkar 2024.11.12 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Ankush Goyal
Satnam Singh
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
