committing rape upon her. PW-4 has also identified the accused in Court, and, the said identification then made by the said witness of the accused in Court, remained unbelied. As such therebys the factum of the accused being known to the witness (supra) becomes cogently established, besides therebys, thus there was no necessity qua prior thereto any valid test identification parade being conducted, nor therebys the first time identification in Court of the accused by the witness (supra) suffers from any infirmity. 14. Since neither any suggestions, became put to PW-4 during the latter's cross-examination, suggestive that his speakings (supra) in his examination-in-chief qua his last seeing together the accused, and, the deceased, rather at the apposite site, hence proximate to the crime site, thus are uncreditworthy, nor when theretos any answers favourable to the accused, thus emanated from PW-4. Thus, the effect of no suggestions (supra) becoming meted to PW-4, during the latter's cross-examination, thus to bely the efficacy of the above candidly spoken facts, is that, it leads to an inference that the defence concedes to PW-4 last seeing together the deceased and the accused, thus in the vicinity of the crime site. The effect thereof is but naturally, qua the apposite last seeing together theory, as espoused by PW-4, thus acquiring the firmest evidentiary vigour.
