The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a petition for non-prosecution, noting that the petitioner did not appear despite three calls and raised no representation.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; pending applications disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:018631
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
221
CRA-S-3309-SB-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.02.2024
POOJA
....Petitioner
VERSUS
SULAKHAN SINGH AND ORS
....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA
Present : None for the appellant.
Mr. P.S. Pandher, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. R.P. Dhir, Advocate for the respondents.
MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral)
( MANISHA BATRA )
09.02.2024
JUDGE
Deepak Patwal
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
Deepak Patwal 2024.02.12 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh
Pooja
Sulakhan Singh And Ors
Manisha Batra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
