Revision petitions regarding a civil suit; counsel for respondents informed the court the suit had already been decided, rendering the revisions infructuous, and the court disposed of them accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[271] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
[1] CR-8264-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision : 13.08.2024
Ajeet Singh and others …Petitioners versus Shakti Singh Rawat and others ….Respondents [2] CR-8265-2017 (O&M) Ajeet Singh and others …Petitioners versus
Shakti Singh Rawat and others ….Respondents
Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Rahul Dahiya, Advocate for the respondents.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
[1] At the outset, counsel for the respondents informs to this Court that since the suit already stands decided, the present revision
petition(s) has become rendered infructuous.
[2] Ordered accordingly.
(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE
13.08.2024
‘R. Sharma'
Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.08.14 06:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ajeet Singh and others
Shakti Singh Rawat and others
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
