Petitioner, a tenant running his business in the premises for over 30 years, sought not to press the revision petition on merits but requested reasonable time to vacate. Respondents raised no objection. Court allowed time till 30.04.2025 to vacate and hand over possession, subject to continued rent payment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:037680
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
114 CR-586-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.03.2024
KARAM SINGH .... Petitioner
VERSUS
HARKESH KAUR THROUGH LRS .... Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate and
Mr. Arun Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Divanshu Jain, Advocate for the respondents.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
AMAN JAIN 2024.03.16 06:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.
114 CR-586-2024 (O&M) -2-
after adjusting the amount which has already been paid in advance. The petitioner shall also furnish an undertaking to this effect before the Rent Controller within a period of 15 days from today. In case the undertaking is not furnished as directed, the present petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed.
15.03.2024 (ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
AMAN JAIN 2024.03.16 06:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted time to vacate the rented premises and hand over possession to the respondent's legal heirs.
Karam Singh
Harkesh Kaur through LRS
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
