Petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars; the court dismissed it as withdrawn with the liberty sought.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
********
123 CR-5289-2024 Date of Decision.:13.09.2024
Gurvinder Singh Pe00oner Vs. Dr. Vimal Chhabra Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: Mr. Karanbir Singh, Advocate for the pe��oner.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the pe��oner has made a statement, so as to
withdraw the pe��on with liberty to file fresh pe��on with be#er par�culars.
Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for with liberty aforesaid.
( DEEPAK GUPTA )
JUDGE
September 13, 2024
Nee�ka Tuteja
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
NEETIKA TUTEJA 2024.09.13 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Gurvinder Singh
Dr. Vimal Chhabra
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
