Tenants' revision against Rent Controller's order refusing leave to defend in an NRI landlord's Section 13B petition was dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated the property had been purchased, with liberty to seek revival if facts differed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:013796
120
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Revision No. 4868 of 2008 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 01.02.2024
Saroj Palliwal and Another
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
Bhupinder Singh
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.
Present: Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajaivir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. A.K.Jain, Advocate for the respondent.
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
2024:PHHC:013796 Civil Revision No. 4868 of 2008 (O&M) 2
application for revival, if the facts are found otherwise.
disposed of.
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge
February 01, 2024 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2024.02.05 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the tenants' revision against refusal of leave to defend a Section 13B eviction petition survived, given the petitioners' purchase of the property.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Saroj Palliwal and Another
Bhupinder Singh
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
