Revision petition challenging dismissal of an application to drop the petitioners' names from a complaint under Section 12 of the DV Act 2005. Counsel sought withdrawal citing a Division Bench judgment; the court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
213
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-3912-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 11.12.2024
Parmjit Singh & Ors ... Petitioner(s)
Versus
Parvinder Kaur & Anr ... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Jaswinder Singh Rana, Advocate for the petitioners.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
11.12.2024 Yogesh Sharma
( ALKA SARIN )
JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
Yogesh Sharma 2024.12.12 12:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Should the petitioners' names be dropped from the respondent's complaint under Section 12 of the DV Act?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Parmjit Singh & Ors
Parvinder Kaur & Anr
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
