Kanwal Agencies and another Pushpinder Singh…
No further order required as petitioners filed undertaking to vacate premises by 30.06.2025.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[146] IN THE HIGH COURT OF P UNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIG A RH [1] CR - 2406-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 26.11.2024 Kanwal A gencies and another …Petitioners ver s us Pushpind e r Singh Cheema ….Respondent [2] CR - 2453-2024 (O&M) Kanwal A gencies …Petitioner versus Pushpind e r Singh Cheema ….Respondent Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Tushar Sharma, Advoca t e with Ms. Shrinkhla, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ujval Mittal, Advocate for the respondent(s). ***
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
[1] On 25.11.2024, the followin g order was passed:-
“ After arguing for so m etime, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions fro m Sh. Satinder Pal Singh, who i s present in person, in the Court today, submits that the petitioner i s ready to vacate the premises o n or before 30.06.2025. He pra y s for time to file undertaking to t h at effect and also to furnish proo f s with respect to payment of rent till date and undertakes that if an y , deficiency in the arrears of re n t is there, the same shall be ma d e good by 30.06.2025.
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.11.28 02:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CR-2406 - 2024 (O&M) & -2CR-2453 - 2024 (O&M)
On his request, adjourn e d to 26.11.2024.
Photocopy of this ord e r be placed on the file of oth e r connected case.”
[2] Today, undertaking on beh a lf of the petitioner(s)-tenant( s ) has been f iled. The same is taken on reco r d.
[3] In view of the undertaking t e ndered by the petitioners before this Cour t , no further order is required to be passed. However, it is mad e clear that tenant(s)-petitioner(s) shall rem a in bound by his undertaking.
[5] Photocopy of this order be p laced on the file of connecte d
case.
(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 26.11.20 2 4 ‘R. Sharma' Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.11.28 02:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
KANWAL AGENCIES
PUSHPINDER SINGH CHEEMA
PANKAJ JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
