THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT…
Revision-petition dismissed on account of withdrawal
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
131
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.2325 of 2024 Date of Decision: 08.05.2024
Rupinder Kumar Bansal
…..Revisionist-Petitioner.
Versus
M/s Kissan Trading Company
.....Respondent.
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present:Mr. Jatin Bansal, Advocate for the revisionist-petitioner.
MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J . (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant revision-petition, while submitting that the petitioner would avail the appropriate and efficacious remedy, as may be permissible to him under law, before the Executing Court itself.
having been withdrawn accordingly.
(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) May 08, 2024 JUDGE Yag Dutt Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether Reportable: No
YAG DUTT 2024.05.08 19:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Rupinder Kumar Bansal
M/s Kissan Trading Company
Meenakshi I. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
