Petitioner sought to withdraw a revision petition against an interim maintenance order with liberty to file an appeal under the Family Courts Act, 1984.
Revision petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appeal before Division Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
226
CR-1739-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 28.10.2024
Rahul alias Rahul Goyal
....Petitioner
VERSUS
Heena
....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Pawan Attri, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ajay Gupta, Advocate for the respondent.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
28.10.2024 jk
( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2024.10.29 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Rahul alias Rahul Goyal
Heena
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
