Petitioner sought withdrawal of petition after noting registration of zero FIR with liberty to challenge it. Petitioner withdrew; petition dismissed.
Withdrawal of petition allowed with liberty to challenge the registered FIR.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
135
2024:PHHC:040278
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-1545-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.03.2024
FARHEEN PRABHAKAR
….Petitioner
VERSUS
M/S A.M. TRADERS
….Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI
Present: Mr. S.K. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.
VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral)
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
March 20, 2024 Sangeeta
(VIKAS SURI) JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SANGEETA 2024.03.22 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Harishchandra s/o Vishwanath Chavan and another vs. The State of Maharashtra through Investigation OfficerRelied on¶1
Harishchandra s/o Vishwanath Chavan and another vs. The State of Maharashtra through Investigation Officer, Law Finder Doc ID #853444
Farheen Prabhaakar
M/s A.M. Traders
Vikas Suri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
