A one-line order: the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition, and the High Court dismissed it as withdrawn. The judgment decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
********
298 CR-1467-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision.:03.10.2024
Ramesh Kumar Thukral Pe44oner Vs. Neeraj Kumar and Another Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. Ni�n Sachdeva, Advocate for the pe��oner.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the pe��oner has made a statement, so as to withdraw the pe��on.
Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for.
( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE October 03, 2024 Nee�ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
NEETIKA TUTEJA 2024.10.03 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ramesh Kumar Thukral
Neeraj Kumar
Another
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
