Contempt petition filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 alleging willful non-compliance with a previous order. The petitioner did not press the petition as the order had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
193
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-608-2024
Date of Decision: September 27, 2024
SANJEEV KUMAR
........Petitioner
Versus
MR. RAJEEV RATTAN
.......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: M r . Naveen Kumar, Advocate f o r M r . K.L. Arora, Advocate for th e petitioner.
M r . Shivendra Swaroop, DAG, H aryana. ****
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
B y way of present petition filed under Sections 11 and 12 o f the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, prayer has been made for initiatio n of contempt proceedings against the resp o ndents on account of allege d willful non-co m pliance of order dated 05.10.2023 passed by this Cour t in CWP-9688 - 2022.
L e arned counsel for the petitioner submits that order date d 05.10.2023 h a s been complied with and a s such, he does not press th e present petiti o n.
Di s missed as not pressed.
R u le discharged.
| 27.09.2024 Tejwinder |
( |
HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE |
|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking/reasone d |
Yes/No | |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
TEJWINDER SINGH 2024.10.01 10:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SANJEEV KUMAR
MR. RAJEEV RATTAN
HARKESH MANUJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
