Petitioner sought initiation of contempt proceedings for non-compliance of an order. Counsel for the petitioner moved to withdraw the petition. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn and the rule discharged.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
229
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-307-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 12, 2024
ATTAR SINGH ........Petitioner Versus MAHAVIR SINGH AND ORS ........Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: M s . Inderpal Kaur, Advocate fo r M r . R.S. Malik, Advocate for th e petitioner.
M r . Shivendra Swaroop, DAG, H aryana.
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
B y way of present petition filed under Sections 10 and 12 o f the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, prayer has been made for initiatio n of contempt proceedings against the respondents for willful non - compliance o f order dated 04.02.2020 b y this Court in CWP-18497 - 2016.
L e arned counsel for the petiti o ner wishes to withdraw th e present petiti o n.
Di s missed as withdrawn.
R u le discharged. P e nding application(s), if any, s hall also stand disposed of.
| 12.09.2024 Tejwinder |
( |
HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE |
|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking/reasone d |
Yes/No | |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
TEJWINDER SINGH 2024.09.13 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ATTAR SINGH
MAHAVIR SINGH AND ORS
HARKESH MANUJA
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
