Madan Lal v. Tvsn Prasad and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition filed under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and Article 215 of the Constitution, seeking action for alleged non-compliance with a previous order, the court noted that the respondent had complied by passing a speaking order. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the same. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with the said liberty a
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the compliance in accordance with law. Rule discharged.