Petitioner sought contempt proceedings for disobedience of an order. Petitioner did not press the petition and sought liberty to approach appropriate remedy. Court dismissed the petition without adjudicating merits.
Petition dismissed; rule stands discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
COCP No.1822 of 2024 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
274
COCP No.1822 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.09.2024
......Petitioner .Petitioner
RAHUL RANA ......Petitioner .Petitioner Vs VINAY KUMAR ....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, DAG, Ha r yana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) 1. By way of present petition file d under Sections 10 & 12 of the Contempt of C o urts Act, 1971, contempt pro c eedings are sought to be initi a ted against the re s pondent towards alleged wil l ful disobedience of order d a ted 20.09.2023 pas s ed by this Court in CWP No.11 7 85 of 2023. 2. Le a rned State counsel representi n g the respondent submits tha t in compliance of o rder dated 20.09.2023, list o f selected/appointed candidates has been sent throu g h E-mail to the petitioner.
(HARKESH MANUJA) September 04, 2024 JUDGE Atik W h ether speaking/reasoned Ye s /No W h ether reportable Ye s /No
MOHMED ATIK 2024.09.05 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Rahul Rana
Vinay Kumar
Harkesh Manuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
