Contempt petition seeking initiation of proceedings against respondent for alleged willful noncompliance of an undertaking. Counsel for petitioner stated the petition had become infructuous, and the court dismissed it as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
COCP No.1622 of 2022 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
226
COCP No.1622 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.09.2024
INDERJIT KAUR Vs SONU CHAUHAN
......Petitioner
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. Rana Gurtej Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Pradeep Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. ****
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral)
(HARKESH MANUJA) September 19, 2024 JUDGE Atik W h ether speaking/reasoned Ye s /No W h ether reportable Ye s /No
MOHMED ATIK 2024.09.20 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Inderjit Kaur
Sonu Chauhan
Harkesh Manuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
