kn o wn as Atta Dal Scheme and th e petitioner has to lift/procure b oth th e commodities separately in w h ich the extent of procuremen t of W h eat/Atta is must more larger t han the Pulses/Dal ad are b e ing tra n sported separately, therefore, the respondents cannot adjust the pa y ment of transportation charg e s and margin money paid to the pe t itioner on account of proc u rement of Pulses/Dal with the pr o curement of Wheat/Atta and h e nce, the action of the respond e nts in t his regard is totally arbitrary and unreasonable, being violativ e of Ar t icles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Co n stitution of India. The respond e nts ma y keep on claiming from the Ce n tral Government the amount w h ich is t o be paid to petitioner toward s margin money and transporta t ion ch a rges on Wheat/Atta but so far a s the petitioner is concerned, he is de f initely entitled to transportati o n charges and margin money on W h eat/Atta separately from the t r ansportation charges and ma r gin money being paid on Pulses/Dal, t h ough under the Atta Dal Scheme. In view of the aforesaid dis c ussion, the present writ petitio n is he r eby allowed and the res p ondents are directed to p ay tra n sportation charges and margin money to the petition on W h eat/Atta being procured and di s tributed by the petitioner under the Att a Dal Scheme, within a perio d of three months from the dat e of re c eipt of certified copy of this ord e r.” 3. Fr o m the record it appears that b y 02.03.2016, respondents wer e to calculate the ha n dling charges for distribution of wheat under the above-mentio n ed scheme and aft e r due verification, release the a m ount due towards the petitioner in
