The court allowed the application to be withdrawn as prayed for by the applicant, granting liberty to approach the court of competent jurisdiction.
Application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach Court of competent jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
106
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ARB-473-2024 Date of Decision: 25.09.2024
M/S MALIK ELECTRICALS
….Applicant
vs.
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Gulab Singh Narwal, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach Court of competent jurisdiction.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
25.09.2024
paramjit
| Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes | |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable: | No |
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.09.25 01:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
M/S MALIK ELECTRICALS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Jagmoohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
