Applicant sought permission to withdraw its arbitration application; the court allowed withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ARB No. 121 of 2021 Date of Decision:14.08.2024
M/s ABW Suncity
….Applicant
vs.
Malini Kalra and others
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Advocate for the applicant
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
instant application.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
14.08.2024
paramjit
| Whether speaking/reasoned: | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| Whether reportable: | Yes | No |
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.08.14 01:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
M/s ABW Suncity
Malini Kalra
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
