The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants against two prior orders due to non-prosecution by the counsel, as no active instructions were forthcoming.
The present appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:163208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
211
RSA-1976-1992 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.12.2023
Khushal Singh and others
....Appellants
Versus
Reshma and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : Mr. Akshat Dalal, Advocate for
Mr. Anurag Chopra, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Lokesh Vohra, Advocate, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. *********
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J.
1 . The present appeal has been filed against the order dated 03.12.1991 passed by the trial Court, whereby the suit filed by plaintiff-appellants has been dismissed and against the order dated 15.06.1992 passed by the Lower Appellate Court, whereby the appeal filed by the defendant-respondents has been allowed.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
19.12.2023 Ankur Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Ankur Goyal 2023.12.21 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
Khushal Singh and others
Reshma and others
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
