a procured document. Perusal of his testimony further reveals that he has tendered into in his examination-in-chief his affidavit Ex.PW3/A, in which he has deposed that he had brought the Pay Salary Register of the deceased Satnam Singh, who was working as a driver in the department, which is Ex.P1. He had seen the photocopy of Pay Salary which is correct according to Register of Pay Salary. Even though, this salary certificate has not been prepared by him, yet it has been produced by him being an employee of the PUNSUP department and no evidence in rebuttal has been produced on record by the respondents to prove that the same was a procured document and was not genuine. Thus, from the salary certificate Ex.P1, it stands proved that deceased was drawing salary of Rs.20,787/per month. If driving license of the deceased has not been produced on record then this does not lead to the inference that he was not employed as a driver with PUNSUP, when no contrary evidence to the evidence led by the claimants has been produced. Otherwise also, proof of driving license of the deceased was not required to prove his employment with PUNSUP as driver. So far as driving license of deceased Ex.PX/5 is concerned, which has been produced on record by insurance company to prove that it had expired on 19.01.2011, before the date of accident, there is nothing on record that it had not been renewed after 19.01.2011 till happening of the accident in question.
