The High Court dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear despite notice. Pending applications were disposed off.
Dismissal of appeal for non-prosecution; disposal of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:050740
205
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-1755-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision : 12.04.2023
Suresh Chand Yadav ....Appellant
VERSUS
Prem Chand and Others ....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None for the appellant.
Mr. Satpal Dhamija, Advocate for respondent No.3.
-.-
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
Notice was issued to the appellant vide order dated 09.01.2023. On 21.02.2023 none appeared on behalf of the appellant despite being duly served. Today also none has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. This Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for non-prosecution. So ordered.
Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
April 12, 2023 (ALKA SARIN) tripti JUDGE
NOTE : Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : YES/NO
TRIPTI SAINI 2023.04.13 09:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Suresh Chand Yadav
Prem Chand and Others
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
