Taranjit Kaur & Ors. v. Gurdev Singh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
�� ��� � �������������������…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
� � � �� � � � �� ��� � � !�" #$%�$&�$ '$$� �$� $& $ � �(� � � � �)+,�-.�/,0121-3�44� �56�+17� �4444483,9::,773+� �;,92<2� �6*9*3=1+�><9�3/�-+?,92� �44444�5,2:-3/,3+2� � � � �693=1+�><9�3/�-+?,92� �4444471@3+::,773+2� �;,92<2� �A<9/,B�C13D?�3/�-+?,92� 44444�5,2:-3/,3+2�� � $EF�� G%H�E I�# J �$E$� $ &$ '� �9,2,3+� K-3,� �.-9�+?,�071@3+24� � 94�@3�><@9L�/B-0+,�.-9� � 94�92?�?-:9L�/B-0*+,� �.-9�-83,9�-.�+?,�-..,3/13D�M<2,:2<�5-/8N� �$E$� $ &$ 'O�#I� � 4 � � P-+? �� +?, �� .-9,21/��::,72��91213D��-<+��-.��+?,��2@,��89/L��2?77� � M, � /,01/,/ � MN � * � 0-@@-3 � =</D@,3+4� � 4 � � 6?, �� -83,956��-.��+?,��-..,3/13D��M<2��?2��.17,/�� � � 0?77,3D13D �� +?, �� .13/13D2 �� 9,0-9/,/��MN��+?,�� -+-9��001/,3+��71@2��691M<37L� �+17�� .-9��2?-9+��Q+?,��691M<37R ��B1/,��89/��/+,/��(44 L��8?,9,2� � ��12��MN��+?,��071@3+2��.-9��,3?30,@,3+��-.��0-@:,32+1-3� �89/,/��-3��00-<3+��-.��/,+?��-.��9M32��C13D?��13����@-+-9��B,?10<79� �001/,3+4� �4� �6?,2,��9,��9,0-32+9<0+,/��02,2L��2��+?,��-91D137��.17,2��8,9,��M<93+��13� �+?,��.19,��+?+��M9-S,��-<+��13��+?,��0-30,93,/��M930?��13��+?,��N,*9��4��C130,��+?,�
MOHIT 2024.01.04 18:05
I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
|�
�
| � � � |
|---|
! "! #$ % &' #$ !( ) ! #$ |
!* +, $ ! !-.# ! ' #$ " ! #$ - ! #$ / )-)! 0 |
0 1 !( ) ! #$ !* +, (-" ## #$# #$ |
, -( ) !"" ## ! *$ ) $!) #$ / ! #$ -( ) #' $!/' !" #$ / ' #$ / ! #$ ' $ $ #$ * |
#/)) ' * $ ") ! -) ! #$ #0 (#$' #$ |
!" # ! * -& #$ , -( ) 2 / -& )& $ $ "()# ) '#$('& !#$ " )! #$)! #$) " #0 |
0 3# / #$ !( ! #$ ) ) -& #$ ) " # |
#$# #$ ' & !) ' 4( # # ! !) ) # -$ $ |
* ' #$ " ! $ ) "!#$0 # #$# # "' $ )& ! +0'% "! #$' $!*/' #$ , -( ) *! )& #$ |
"! #$)& & +0'%0 5!#$ $ - * #!* |
( ) 2 ' (#( !# ! !"' )! ! ! !# (" |
) )! !# ("#!#$$ ) 0 |
0 ( 0 0 3# ! # #! #! #$ / #$# $ #$ #$ , -( ) $ ) #$ ( ) ! #$ / ! #$ -(' $ $ #$#' 6,$ ! )& # ' $! $ !# #! #7 ' / |
#$ $ ")!& $! #! $/ (# !#$ #$ / ! *$ $ * |
!#' ! #! $ "' ! #-) 8(). # 4 $ 90 |
| 0 ## #$# $ #/)) #$ ' $ $ * - / -& !$ 4 $ #$# |
� #$�� �� $ �� �� #$�� #�� ! �� #$�� :$ ( $�� !#�� !$ �� 4 $�� /� � $ �� )!* �� !* �� #$�� �� �� #$ �� #!!7�� �� #( �� #!* �� #$�� #�� ! �� #$�� � � *�� - �� !* �� #$�� �� !"�� #$�� " �� ! �� #!* �� #$�� �� ! �� #$�� #� acy and rder/judgment |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- FAO/1011/1992
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court