The High Court disposed of a writ petition by directing the respondents to draw a lawful speaking order based on Annexure P-10 after hearing all affected persons within eight weeks.
Direction to respondents to draw a lawful speaking order upon Annexure P-10 after hearing all affected persons within eight weeks from the date of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:062145-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
122
CWP-9244-2023 Date of Decision: 01.05.2023
Anmol Chopra
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI
Present: Mr. Sukhdeep Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G. Haryana.
SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.(ORAL)
Disposed of with a direction to the respondents concerned, to
within eight weeks from today, draw a lawful speaking order, upon, Annexure P-10, but after hearing all affected persons concerned.
(SURESHWAR THAKUR) JUDGE
(KULDEEP TIWARI)
JUDGE
01.05.2023 Satyawan
SATYAWAN 2023.05.02 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the respondents to frame a lawful speaking order and hear affected parties.
Anmol Chopra
State of Haryana
SURESHWAR THAKUR
KULDEEP TIWARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
