The High Court held that a writ is not appropriate as the petitioner failed to attend counselling sessions for recruitment despite being given multiple opportunities to appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:055029
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
110
CWP-8514-2021 Date of Decision: 19.04.2023
Anjali
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present: Mr.Pritam Saini, Advocate and Ms. Mehak Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. D.K. Singal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. ***
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. (Oral)
(ANIL KSHETARPAL) JUDGE
19.04.2023 Satyawan
SATYAWAN 2023.04.24 11:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ should be issued when the petitioner failed to attend the counselling sessions for recruitment.
Anjali
State of Punjab
Anil Kshetrapal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
