Petitioner sought dismissal of the writ petition relying on a prior order in Civil Writ Petition No. 29 of 2023. The Court disposed of the present petition as ordered.
The writ petition was disposed of as ordered in the earlier interlocutory order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
134
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Writ Petition No. 802 of 2023
Date of Decision: 16.01.2023
Sandeep Kumar and Others
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and Others
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.
Present: Mr. Sunny Singla, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Maninder Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents.
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
Others v. State of Punjab and Others (Civil Writ Petition No. 29 of 2023, decided on 10.01.2023) , the learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition and the same be disposed of as such.
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge
January 16, 2023 “DK”
Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2023.01.17 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kuljeet Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others (Civil Writ Petition No. 29 of 2023, decided on 10.01.2023)Referred¶14
Sandeep Kumar and Others
State of Punjab and Others
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
