The high court disposed of a writ petition challenging a service transfer by directing the petitioner to file a representation to the competent authority for sympathetic consideration.
Direction to file a representation to the Competent Authority within three working days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
118
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Writ Petition No. 80 of 2023
Date of Decision: 06.01.2023
Ranbir Singh Mudhal
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
The State of Punjab and Others
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.
Present: Mr. Rajinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. R.K.Kapoor, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents.
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
Civil Writ Petition No. 80 of 2023 2
next three working days, which will be disposed of within a period of one
week, positively.
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge January 06, 2023 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2023.01.10 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking quashing of transfer order should be dismissed below or entertained on merits.
Ranbir Singh Mudhal
The State of Punjab
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
