This single-line order disposed of a writ petition seeking quashing of a 10-year-old charge sheet after the State counsel undertook to decide the matter within two weeks, rendering no further order necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
127
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Writ Petition No. 799 of 2023
Date of Decision: 30.01.2023
Khushwinder Mangla
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and Others
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.
Present: Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Vikas Arora, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents.
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2023.02.01 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and a period of two weeks from today. integrity of this document
Civil Writ Petition No. 799 of 2023 2
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge January 30, 2023 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2023.02.01 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Khushwinder Mangla
State of Punjab
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
