Suman Lata and Another v. Deputy Commissioner, Fatehabad
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
214 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-7853-2021 (O&M) Date of decision-17.01.2023
Suman Lata and another ...Petitioners
Vs.
Deputy Commissioner Fatehabad and others ...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ BAJAJ
Present: Ms. Shelja Sharma, Advocate for Mr. S.S. Sahu, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Vikas Bishnoi, Advocate for respondent No.3.
MANOJ BAJAJ, J. (Oral)
Petitioners have filed this writ petition under Article 226 Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari seeking quashing of impugned order dated 03.03.2021 (Annexure P-3) passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Fatehabad, whereby the petitioners have been ejected from the residential house (Dhani).
Learned counsel states that during the pendency of the writ petition, petitioner No.2-husband of petitioner No.1 expired on 25.02.2022 and, thereafter, petitioner No.1 has performed marriage with Anil S/o Lt. Mewa Singh, R/o Rawatkhera, District Hisar. She further states that her son from the first marriage is residing with petitioner No.1, therefore, this petition is rendered infructuous..
Dismissed as infructuous.
| (MANOJ BAJAJ) JUDGE |
||
|---|---|---|
| 17.01.2023 | ||
| geeta | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned : | Yes No |
|
| Whether Reportable : | Yes No |
GEETA RANI 2023.01.19 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suman Lata and another
Deputy Commissioner Fatehabad and others
Manoj Bajaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court