Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the present writ petition. The court granted such permission.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:049048
129
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Writ Petition No. 7061 of 2023
Date of Decision: 11.04.2023
Vinod Kumar and Others ... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab and Another ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal. Present: Mr. Vishal Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Vishnav Gandhi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Anil Kshetarpal, J.
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2023.04.12 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Vinod Kumar and Others
State of Punjab
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
