The petitioner did not appear and no representation was made on his behalf on the last date of hearing. The court presumed non-interest in pursuing the remedy and dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No.2023:PHHC:155610
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
220
CWP-3347-2019 (O&M) Decided on :06.12.2023
Mohit Gerg
. .Petitioner
Versus
Haryana Staff Selection Commission . . . Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
PRESENT: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral)
behalf of the petitioner.
pursuing the present remedy.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE
06.12.2023 Riya
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
RIYA 2023.12.06 16:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Mohit Gerg
Haryana Staff Selection Commission
Harsimran Singh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
