High Court dismissed a writ petition bearing CWP-3184-1996 for want of prosecution, as the petitioner had died and no legal representatives pursued the matter before a Coordinate Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No.2023:PHHC:159438
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
207
CWP-3184-1996 (O&M) Decided on :13.12.2023
Sham Lal . .Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
. . . Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
PRESENT: None for th e petitioner.
Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral)
"Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is dead and seeks time to bring his LRs on record.
Adjourned sine die to do the needful."
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE
13.12.2023 Riya
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
RIYA 2023.12.14 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sham Lal
State of Haryana
Harsimran Singh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
