Petitioner filed a writ petition claiming it became infructuous as the underlying application was already decided by the competent authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
263
CWP No. 24080 of 2022 Date of Decision: 23.01.2023
Rahul Arora
......Petitioner
Vs
State of Punjab and anr
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present: Mr.P.S.Bawa, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Sanjiv Soni, Addl.A.G.Punjab.
RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has become infructuous as the application filed by the petitioner has already been decided by the competent authority.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(RAJ MOHAN SINGH)
January 24, 2023 JUDGE anita Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
ANITA DEVI 2023.01.25 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and autenticity of this jugejumenmt\order
Rahul Arora
State of Punjab
Raj Mohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
