Petitioner filed a writ for mandamus directing respondents to consider his service as SPO qualifying for pension benefits. Court directed respondent 2 to expediently decide the legal notice on this matter within three months.
Direction to respondent No.2 to consider and dispose of legal notice dated 21.8.2023 expeditiously within 3 months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:134117
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CWP-23368-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision:-16.10.2023
ASI/LR Avtar Singh … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others . . . Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Baljeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)
MOHAN SINGH 2023.10.16 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
2023:PHHC:134117
CWP-23368-2023 (O&M)
( 2 )
16.10.2023 ( GURVINDER SINGH GILL ) mohan JUDGE Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
MOHAN SINGH 2023.10.16 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's services as SPO should be considered qualifying service for pensionary benefits.
Whether pending legal notice requires a decision on service recognition under settled law.
ASI/LR Avtar Singh
State of Punjab and others
GURVINDER SINGH GILL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
