The petition was dismissed as infructuous upon the Court being informed that the passport in question had been issued. The Court found no need to examine the merits of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 104 ���������������� CWP No. 14830 of 2023 Date of Decision: 16.08.2023
Karan Singh Yadav
---Petitioner
versus
Union of India and another
---Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Tushar Gera, Advocate for
Mr. Narinder Singh, Advcate for the petitioner
Ms. Shweta Nahata, Advocate for Union of India
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
( JAGMOHAN BANSAL )
JUDGE
16.08.2023
paramjit
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes
Whether reportable : Yes/No
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2023.08.16 18:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Karan Singh Yadav
Union of India
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
