Writ petition challenged a show cause notice. The Court held the petition was premature as no order was passed by the Competent Authority and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
114
CWP No.1144 of 2023 Date of decision: 20.01.2023
BASIR AHMAD
...Petitioner
Versus
UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND OTHERS
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present: Mr. Munish Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner.
RAJ MOHAN SINGH , J.(ORAL)
The petitioner has challenged a show cause notice dated 21.12.2022 issued by the Executive Engineer, OP Division, UHBVN, Bilaspur to which the petitioner has already filed a reply.
The writ petition is wholly premature as no order has
been passed by the Competent Authority.
Dismissed.
20.01.2023 (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) P.Bhatt JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No
POONAM BHATT 2023.01.20 14:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this Judicial Record/Decree/Document, which is scanned copy of the original
Basir Ahmad
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited
Raj Mohan Singh
Poonam Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
