The petition was dismissed in default for want of prosecution as the petitioners were absent on the last date of hearing and the court found them to be no longer interested.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
276 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Neutral Citation No. 2023:PHHC:154460 CRWP-8827-2023 Date of Decision: December 04, 2023
Manpreet Kaur and another
…Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: - None for the petitioners.
Mr. Parneet Singh Pandher, AAG, Punjab.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Even on the last date of hearing, nobody had put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that petitioners are no longer interested in pursuing this petition.
Dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
December 04, 2023 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SARITA RANI 2023.12.04 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/order
Manpreet Kaur
State of Punjab
DEEPAK GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
