In a habeas corpus petition filed by Daar Singh for the release of Labh Kaur and two minor girls, the petitioner argued the petition was infructuous. The single judge held the petition infructuous and disposed of it without passing orders.
No order passed; Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
216 CRWP-4801-2021 Date of Decision: 08.08.2023
Daar Singh ......... Pe��oner
Versus
State of Punjab and others ......... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present:Mr. Anmol Jeevan Singh, Advocate for the pe��oner.
Mr. Karunesh Kaushal, AAG, Punjab.
Ms. Manjit Kaur Saini, Advocate for respondents No. 4 to 6.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
The present pe��on has been filed under Ar�cle 226 of the Cons�tu�on of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus for release of detenue Labh Kaur and two minor girls Paramjit Kaur and Harjit Kaur before this Court from illegal deten�on of respondents No. 4 to 6.
the same is disposed of having been rendered infrucutous. All pending miscellaneous applica�ons, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA)
JUDGE
08.08.2023
Jyo�-II
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
JYOTI 2023.08.09 13:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Daar Singh
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
