Sushma and Another v. State of Haryana and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court disposed of a writ petition filed live-in-relationship parties seeking protection from harassment by their family members under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution, directing the Superintendent of Police to decide on their representation.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent no.2 (SP, Ambala) to decide the petitioners' representation and grant protection if any threat is perceived.
What the court decided
-1-
CRWP-444-2023
107
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-444-2023
Date of Decision: January 17, 2023
Sushma and another ......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Present: Mr.Sandeep Saini, Advocate for the petitioners.
RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL)
Present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents no.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents no.4 to 6 with a further direction to respondents no.4 to 6 not to harass or interfere in the peaceful life of petitioners, who are living in live-in-relationship.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sushma and another
- respondent
State of Haryana and others
Coram
RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRWP/444/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court