Petitioner invoked Article 21 fearing for life and liberty. Court disposed petition with liberty to file detailed representation to SSP within 15 days for a time-bound decision within two months by an IPS officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC: 110658
CRWP No.4109-2022
1
210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No.4109-2022 Date of decision: August 24, 2023
Sukhvir Singh @ Sukhbir Singh ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others …Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Ms. Nancy Vashistha, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Karunesh Kaushal, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Mohd. Salim, Advocate for respondent No.6
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
Fearing for their lives and liberty at the hands of the private respondents, the petitioner, has come up before this Court by invoking their fundamental rights of life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, seeking direction to the State to protect them.
Sonia Arora 2023.08.24 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2023:PHHC: 110658
CRWP No.4109-2022
2
also verify its authenticity and may download and use the downloaded copy for immediate use.
Petition is allowed to the extent mentioned above . All pending applications, if any, stand disposed.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
August 24, 2023 sonia arora Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.
Sonia Arora 2023.08.24 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sukhvir Singh @ Sukhbir Singh
State of Punjab and others
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
