Irshad v. State of Haryana and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
����������������
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
104 CRWP-3917-2023 Date of Decision: 21.07.2023
Irshad ......... Pe��oner Versus
State of Haryana and others ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present:Mr. Azad, Advocate for Mr. Tejinder Singh Malik, Advocate the pe��oner. Mr. Manish Bansal, Sr. D.A.G, Haryana. Mr. Baljeet Beniwal, Advocate for respondents No. 5 to 7.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the pe��oner wants to withdraw the present pe��on. Given above, present pe��on stands disposed of having been withdrawn. All
pending miscellaneous applica�ons, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA)
JUDGE
21.07.2023
Jyo�-II
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
JYOTI 2023.07.24 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
Irshad
State of Haryana
ANoop CHitkARA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court