Disposed

Sanju and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC20 Apr 2023CRWP/3634/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This protection petition under Article 226 sought protection against family interference after a marriage conducted against parental wishes. No material was found regarding the petitioner's abduction. The Court disposed of the petition, directing the Superintendent of Police to examine the representation and take action if any truth is found.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Superintendent of Police to examine the representation and take appropriate action if any substance of truth is found.

Sanju and Another Vs State of Haryana and Others — Domestic Violence | Punjab & Haryana HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. 2023:PHHC:055250

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

107

¶4

CRWP-3634-2023 (O&M) Decided on : 20.04.2023

¶5

Sanju and another

¶6

. . . Petitioner(s)

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Haryana and others . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

¶9

PRESENT: Mr. Ashwani Vaishnav, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶10

Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana.

¶11

¶12

SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral)

¶13

In the present protection petition, after hearing the petitioners,

¶14

on 18.04.2023 following order was passed:-

¶15

“ Present: Mr. S. K. Bishnoi, Advocate for Mr. Ashwani Vaishnav, Advocate for the petitioners. ***

¶16

1. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of directions to respondents No. 2 and 3 to provide protection of lives and liberty of the petitioners, who have married against the wishes of private respondents i.e. 4 to 6.

¶17

2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioner No.1- Sanju, aged about 19 years and petitioner No.2 – Rohatash, aged about 33 years, have got married on 14.04.2023 against the wishes of their family members, arrayed as respondents No. 4 to 6. It is first marriage of both the petitioners.

¶18

3. It has been further submitted that private respondents are threatening to interfere in the matrimonial life of petitioners. Hence, petitioners are seeking protection in that regard and have approached this Court by way of filing the instant petition. They have also submitted a representation dated 14.04.2023 (Annexure P-4), to respondent No.2 – Superintendent of Police, Sirsa, Haryana, wherein, they have

¶19

RIYA 2023.04.20 13:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶20

CRWP-3634-2023 (O&M) -22023:PHHC:055250

¶21

expressed their apprehension.

¶22

4. At the very outset, learned State counsel informs this Court that petitioner No. 1-Sanju and her family members i.e. respondents No. 4 to 6 are the residents of District Churu (Rajasthan), so he needs some time to verify the credentials of the petitioners.

¶23

5. Adjourned to 20.04.2023”

¶24

Today, Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana, on instructions from SI Subhash Chand, infroms the Court that on an enquiry conducted by the police officials by visiting the house of petitioner No. 1-Sanju, it is found that one Missing Person Report dated 0006/2023 has been got lodged by the father of petitioner No. 1-Sanju at Police Station Sahawa, District Churu. However, as of now, there is no material to say that petitioner No. 1-Sanju, has been forcibly taken away by anybody.

¶25

In the backdrop of said circumstances and submissions addressed before this Court by both the sides, present petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2-Superintendent of Police, Sirsa, Haryana to examine the representation dated 14.04.2023 (Annexure P- 4) and in case any substance of truth is found in the contentions mentioned therein, an appropriate action for security of the petitioners would be taken, as per law.

¶26

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE

¶27

20.04.2023 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No

¶28

RIYA 2023.04.20 13:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Sanju and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanju and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Inderjit Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Others

Gundeep Kaur and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Others

Rinku and Another Vs State of Haryana and Others

George Shubh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Prabhkirat Singh and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others

Sharanjit Kaur and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.