Disposed

Jitender Singh and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC31 Oct 2023CRWP/10592/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, without examining the legality of an inter-indegree marriage, ordered the Superintendent of Police to investigate threats made against the petitioners and ensure their safety from private respondents.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Superintendent of Police to investigate threats and ensure the life and liberty of the petitioners are not jeopardized. This direction will not validate the marriage.

Jitender Singh and Another Vs State of… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Punjab & Haryana HC (2023)

¶1

2023:PHHC:138712 CRWP No. 10592 of 2023 1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CRWP No. 10592 of 2023 Date of decision : October 31, 2023

¶4

Jitender Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

¶6

Present : Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners

¶7

KULDEEP TIWARI,J. (ORAL)

¶8

The instant petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the official respondents to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents not to harass or interfere in their peaceful married life.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are married. The date of birth of petitioner no. 1 is 16.10.2001 and thus he has completed 22 years of age and the date of birth of petitioner no. 2 is 16.4.2003 and that she is now 20 years of age. To substantiate this submission, learned counsel for the petitioners placed reliance upon copies of Aadhar Cards attached with the petition as Annexures P/1 and P/2. He further submits that both the petitioners have solemnized marriage against the wishes of respondents no. 4 and 5 on 26.10.2023 and now they are apprehending threat to their lives and liberty

¶10

DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2023.10.31 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

¶11

2023:PHHC:138712

¶12

CRWP No. 10592 of 2023 2

¶13

at the hands of private respondents. He further submits that the petitioners have submitted a representation dated 26.10.2023, Annexure P/5 to the official respondents but no action has been taken on the same.

¶14

Notice of motion.

¶15

On asking of the Court, Mr. Krishan K. Chahal, Addl. AG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents no. 1 to 3.

¶16

In view of the above, without examining the question of legality and validity of the marriage and expressing any opinion thereon, the petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent no. 2 - The Superintendent of Police, Fatehabad to look into the representation dated 26.10.2023, (Annexure P/5) qua threat perception and if there is any substance in it, shall take necessary steps in accordance with law, to ensure that the lives and liberty of the petitioners are not jeopardized at the hands of private respondents.

¶17

However, this direction will not validate the marriage as claimed by the petitioners and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law.

¶18

Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶19

( KULDEEP TIWARI )

¶20

October 31, 2023 JUDGE 'tiwana'

¶21

Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Whether Reportable ? Yes/No

¶22

DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2023.10.31 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

Jitender Singh and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitender Singh and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anshul Vs State of Haryana

Suresh Kumar Vs Rajinder Dhull, Advocate

Kirna Rani Vs State of Punjab

Neha Rana and Another Vs State of Ut Chandigarh and Others

Gurbhej Singh Vs State of Punjab

Ajay Kumar Vs State of Ut Chandigarh