Petitioner challenged framing of charges under various IPC sections via a Section 482 CrPC petition. Counsel withdrew the petition with liberty to raise pleas later, which was dismissed accordingly.
Dismissal of the petition as withdrawn with liberty to raise pleas at the time of arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
108 2023:PHHC:058934
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR-557-2023(O&M) Date of Decision: April 26, 2023
MANJEET
........ Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
........ Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. Satish Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
By way of present petition filed under Section 482 CrPC, challenge has been made to order dated 09.12.2023 passed by Court of Ld. Addl. Sessions Judge, Hisar whereby charges under Section 302, 506, 323 IPC and Section 27 of Arms Act have been framed against the petitioner.
26.04.2023 (HARKESH MANUJA) tejwinder JUDGE
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
|---|---|
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
TEJWINDER SINGH 2023.04.26 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manjeet
State of Haryana
Harkesh Manuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
