The High Court at Chandigarh disposed of the revision petition as infructuous upon instructions from the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:116610
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
230 CRR-526-2021
Date of decision: 05.09.2023
Sukhdev Singh @ Kaibu
....Petitioner
V/s
State of Punjab
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present: Ms. Himani Kapila, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sachin Kaushik, AAG Punjab.
ARUN MONGA, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that proceedings before this Court are rendered infructuous and, therefore, she has
instructions not to press the instant revision petition.
(ARUN MONGA)
JUDGE
September 05, 2023 Ajay
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
AJAY KUMAR 2023.09.06 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Sukhdev Singh @ Kaibu
State of Punjab
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
