The High Court dismissed the miscellaneous bail application as it was not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Application dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
243 2023:PHHC:054861
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR-262-2022 Date of Decision: April 19, 2023
SANJIV KUMAR
........ Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
........ Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. Amit Shukla, AAG, Punjab.
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for petitioner does not wish to press the
present petition.
Dismissed as not pressed.
19.04.2023 ( HARKESH MANUJA ) tejwinder JUDGE
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
|---|---|
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
TEJWINDER SINGH 2023.04.20 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sanjiv Kumar
State of Punjab
Harkesh Manuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
