Petitioners, relying on a prior order in CRR-4730-2016, abandoned the present petition (CRR-2347-2017). The court disposed of the petition as it was not pressed.
Petition and pending applications disposed of as they were not pressed by counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 2023:PHHC:140406
CRR-2347-2017 (O&M)
209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR-2347-2017 (O&M) Decided on: 03.11.2023
Harjinder Singh and ors. ...Petitioners Versus Central Bureau of Investigation and anr. …Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. C.S. Bakshi, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Rajeev Anand, Advocate for respondent-CBI.
Mr. Shiva Khurmi, AAG, Punjab.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
Counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the order passed in
CRR-4730-2016 titled as Jasbir Singh vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and others, he
does not press the present petition.
Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 03.11.2023 anju rani Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.
ANJU RANI 2023.11.20 14:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jasbir Singh vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and othersReferred¶11
CRR-4730-2016 titled as Jasbir Singh vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and others
Harjinder Singh and ors.
Central Bureau of Investigation
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
