The petitioner, seeking regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in an FIR for IPC offences and Arms Act violation, voluntarily withdrew the petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
None, as the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:075137
CRM-M-9856-2023
-1-
225
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
********
CRM-M-9856-2023 Date of Decision: 24.05.2023
Deepanshu
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER
Present: Mr. Pankaj Bains, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ram Kumar Singla, DAG, Haryana.
HARSH BUNGER J. (ORAL)
Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.44 dated 20.01.2022, registered under Sections 379-B, 392, 397, 454 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station Meham (Annexure P-1).
24.05.2023 (HARSH BUNGER) Himani JUDGE 1. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No 2. Whether reportable : Yes/No
HIMANI GUPTA 2023.05.25 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh
Deepanshu
State of Haryana
Harsh Bunga
Himani Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
